Technosophism

An analysis of ontological and epistemological views on the forging of psychological and sociological constructions of the self and the role that technology plays in effecting this process.

1/10/2005

The Golem of Prague

There is an interesting piece of Jewish folklore that predates Mary Shelley's Frankenstein with respect to a critical reflection on the role of technology in a human context:
A rabbi in the Jewish ghetto in Prague was so overwhelmed in relieving the suffering of his charges that he invented an automaton that, when he placed the Shem (name of G-d inscribed on a stone) in its forehead, it set about assisting with laborious chores such as making voluminous quantities of porridge. The Golem had the capacity to bear the likeness of things but never the substance—one could, only in the most vicarious sense, experience the taste of exotic foods and sweets, but could never be nourished by its images and deceptions. A truculent young boy dared enter the rabbi’s quarters on the Sabbath so that he might enjoy all that the Golem could conjure, however, he lacked the knowledge to make it stop and the Golem produced such a prodigious quantity that all of Prague drowned in a sea of porridge!

3 Comments:

At January 10, 2005 at 3:17 PM, Blogger Mark Federman said...

Of course, there are many stories of the Prague Golem that was brought to life by Rabbi Loeb. The particular one that Jim relates is not one with which I am familiar (and it does have a certain "Sorcerer's Apprentice" quality to it ;).

The version that I know about emphasizes the use of the word "EMET," meaning "TRUTH" placed on the Golem's forehead to bring it to life. EMET is an interesting word, in that it is comprised of the first, middle and last letters of the Hebrew alphabet, suggesting that TRUTH is all encompassing. When the Golem was to be turned back into lifeless clay, the aleph was removed, leaving the word MET, or DEATH.

 
At January 11, 2005 at 12:24 AM, Blogger Jim Kinney said...

I Like The truth and death aspect of the SHEM that Mark refers too. It may well be the limitations of transliteration but isn't death MAWET or MUT?. You have to excuse my zeal...I do not get much opportunity to practice my Hebrew and I could not resist the HILAEL (there I go again). I am confident, given the great economy of the Hebrew language that EMET is derived from the three letter root for death. It is possible that the removal of the first consonant would shift the stress and cause the "AWE" to contract to a holem vuv or a sureq.
Perhaps, only in death, will we completely apprehend the bare truth.

 
At January 11, 2005 at 12:39 AM, Blogger Jim Kinney said...

Mark: I just checked some references to Golem that confirm the name of G_D as well as EMET and removing the Aleph. Would using that same approach on the name of G_D would have the same effect?
ELOHIM would give Lo--the particle of negation.
Your thoughts?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Creative Commons License
Technosophism by Jim Kinney is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.
Based on a work at www.mcluhan.utoronto.ca.